hold on there's just too much going on in Congress lmao...
States U.S. should favor bilateral deals over multilateral groups.
Sen. Mike Lee (R-UT)
Referred to Senate Foreign Relations Committee.
This non-binding resolution expresses the Senate's view that the U.S. should prioritize one-on-one security agreements with partner countries instead of multilateral institutions like the UN or NATO. Sponsored by Senator Mike Lee, it was sent to the Foreign Relations Committee for consideration. As a resolution, it would not have the force of law but signals policy direction.
Introduced Apr 15, 2026
This bill is under review by a committee. The committee holds hearings, gathers testimony from experts and stakeholders, and may propose amendments. If the committee votes to advance it, the bill moves to the full chamber for debate and a vote.
While this resolution is non-binding, it reflects a policy shift that could lead to decreased U.S. financial contributions to multilateral organizations like the UN and WHO, saving taxpayer money in the short term. However, reduced multilateral engagement might strain alliances like NATO, potentially requiring the U.S. to negotiate separate security pacts with each country.
Supporters Say
Supporters argue bilateral agreements give the U.S. more leverage and better serve American interests.
Critics Say
Critics contend that multilateral cooperation is essential for tackling global threats and preserving alliances.
Supporters say multilateral institutions are inefficient and often controlled by countries hostile to U.S. values, whereas bilateral deals allow tailored agreements. Critics note that many global security challenges, like terrorism and pandemics, require collective action, and abandoning multilateralism could isolate the U.S. and embolden rivals like China.