hold on there's just too much going on in Congress lmao...
Orders President to remove US forces from Iran without Congressional war authorization.
Sen. Duckworth (D-IL) and several other Senators.
Introduced in Senate, currently in committee.
This bill aims to stop ongoing U.S. military involvement in Iran, called Operation Epic Fury, unless Congress formally declares war or authorizes the use of military force. It was introduced by Senator Tammy Duckworth, a Democrat from Illinois, along with five other Senators. The bill is currently under review by a Senate committee, meaning it has not yet been voted on by the full Senate.
Introduced Mar 10, 2026
This bill has been introduced in the Senate and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations. For it to become law, the committee must approve it, then it needs to pass a vote in the full Senate, then pass a vote in the House of Representatives, and finally be signed by the President. If the President vetoes it, Congress could try to override the veto with a two-thirds vote in both chambers.
If this bill becomes law, U.S. service members currently involved in hostilities within or against Iran, as part of Operation Epic Fury, would be removed from those combat roles. However, the bill specifies that it would not prevent the U.S. from defending itself or its personnel in other nations, continuing to gather intelligence on Iran, assisting partner countries attacked by Iran, or evacuating U.S. citizens from the region. This means while direct offensive military action would cease, other security-related activities would remain.
Supporters Say
Supporters argue that only Congress has the constitutional power to declare war and authorize military action.
Critics Say
Critics might argue that the President needs flexibility to act quickly in national security situations without congressional delays.
Those in favor of the bill emphasize that the U.S. Constitution gives Congress the sole power to declare war, not the President. They believe that military actions like Operation Epic Fury require explicit authorization from Congress. Those who might oppose the bill, likely from the executive branch, could argue that the President has a constitutional duty and inherent authority to protect U.S. interests and personnel, especially in rapid response situations, and that congressional authorization can be too slow or restrictive.