hold on there's just too much going on in Congress lmao...
Bans new cars, software, hardware from adversarial countries/companies.
Sen. Moreno, Rep. Slotkin
Introduced in Senate, no vote yet.
This bill, the "Connected Vehicle Security Act of 2026," aims to prevent vehicles, software, and hardware from specific "covered countries" or companies controlled by them from being sold in the U.S. It lists countries like China and Russia as adversaries. Senator Moreno and Representative Slotkin introduced it, suggesting a bipartisan concern for national security. It's currently in the early stages, having just been introduced in the Senate.
Introduced Apr 29, 2026
This bill was introduced in the Senate on April 29, 2026, and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation. For it to become law, it would need to pass in the Senate committee, then be voted on and passed by the full Senate. After that, it would go to the House of Representatives for a similar process, and finally, to the President for approval.
If this bill becomes law, starting January 1, 2027, you might find fewer new connected vehicles and their software available for sale if they originate from or are significantly controlled by companies in countries like China, Russia, Iran, or North Korea. By 2030, this restriction would extend to connected vehicle hardware. Car manufacturers would have to certify that their products meet these new restrictions, which could alter supply chains and product offerings, potentially affecting vehicle choice and cost.
Supporters Say
Supporters argue it protects U.S. national security and economic interests from foreign adversaries' control over critical vehicle technology.
Critics Say
Critics might argue it could limit consumer choice, increase vehicle costs, or disrupt global supply chains.
The bill's findings state that connected vehicles from foreign adversaries pose risks like surveillance, espionage, and disruption of critical infrastructure, threatening U.S. economic and national security. While the bill text doesn't explicitly state criticisms, potential arguments against such a ban often include concerns about limiting competition, increasing costs for consumers due to reduced supply, and the complexity of disentangling international automotive supply chains.