hold on there's just too much going on in Congress lmao...
Allows transit funds for art costs.
Senators Hirono (D, HI), Reed (D, RI).
Introduced in Senate, now in committee.
This bill, called the "STAR Act," proposes to amend federal law (Title 49 of the U.S. Code) to make it easier for public transit projects to use federal funds for the extra costs of including art in facilities. It was introduced by Senators Mazie Hirono of Hawaii and Jack Reed of Rhode Island, both Democrats. Currently, it has been referred to the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation for review.
Introduced Apr 21, 2026
The bill was introduced in the Senate on April 21, 2026, and sent to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation. For it to advance, the committee must approve it, after which it would need to be voted on and passed by the full Senate. If it passes the Senate, it would then go to the House of Representatives for their consideration, and finally to the President for signature to become law.
If the STAR Act becomes law, federal funds designated for public transit facilities could more readily cover the additional costs of incorporating art into their design and construction. This change might lead to more artistic elements in your local train stations, bus stops, or other transit hubs, potentially making these public spaces more engaging. It could also create new opportunities for artists to contribute to public infrastructure projects.
Supporters Say
Supporters would argue art in transit improves public spaces and community engagement.
Critics Say
Critics might suggest funds should prioritize core transit services over artistic enhancements.
Those in favor of the bill likely believe that integrating art into transit facilities enhances the rider experience, contributes to local culture, and makes public spaces more inviting. Conversely, critics might argue that federal transit dollars should be strictly reserved for functional infrastructure needs, such as maintenance, safety, and expansion of routes, rather than aesthetic additions.