hold on there's just too much going on in Congress lmao...
Creates federal crimes for ATM robberies, damage, and related assaults.
Senators Cruz (R-TX), Gallego (D-AZ), Blackburn (R-TN); reported by Sen. Grassley (R-IA).
Passed Senate committee, awaiting full Senate vote.
This bill creates new federal crimes and penalties for offenses involving Automated Teller Machines (ATMs), such as robbing users, attacking servicers, or damaging the machines. It was introduced by Senators Cruz (R-TX), Gallego (D-AZ), and Blackburn (R-TN). The Senate Judiciary Committee, led by Senator Grassley (R-IA), reviewed and approved the bill, moving it to the full Senate for a vote.
Introduced Feb 5, 2026
The bill was introduced in the Senate on February 5, 2026, and referred to the Senate Judiciary Committee. On March 5, 2026, the committee reported the bill with an amendment, meaning it has been approved by the committee and is now ready for consideration by the full Senate. For it to become law, it must pass both the Senate and the House of Representatives, and then be signed by the President.
If this bill becomes law, anyone who robs or attempts to rob someone using or servicing an ATM, or transporting cash to an ATM, could face federal charges and up to 20 years in prison. Breaking into, damaging, or stealing from an ATM could also lead to federal charges, with penalties ranging from 1 year to 10 years depending on the amount stolen. This expansion of federal law aims to deter ATM-related crimes, potentially making these transactions safer for everyone.
Supporters Say
Supporters would argue this bill enhances public safety by establishing federal penalties for growing ATM-related crimes.
Critics Say
Critics might argue existing state and local laws are sufficient, or that federalizing these crimes creates overreach.
Those in favor likely see this as a necessary step to address a specific type of crime that may cross state lines or involve significant financial networks, ensuring consistent and severe penalties. Opponents could point to the potential for double jeopardy with state laws or argue that local law enforcement is better equipped to handle these incidents without federal intervention.