hold on there's just too much going on in Congress lmao...
Resolution condemning Maduro, praising Trump's action, and criticizing dissenting lawmakers.
Representative Crawford (R-AR), with Salazar, Steube, Scott, LaHood, and Kelly (all R).
Introduced in House, referred to committees
This resolution, introduced by Representative Crawford (R-AR) and several Republican co-sponsors, condemns Nicolas Maduro's regime and commends President Trump for a special operation on January 3, 2026, to arrest Maduro. It also criticizes specific Democratic lawmakers who spoke out against this operation. The bill has been introduced in the House and referred to committees, meaning it is in the early stages of the legislative process.
Introduced Jan 12, 2026
The resolution was introduced in the House of Representatives on January 12, 2026. It has been referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs and the House Committee on the Judiciary. For this resolution to move forward, these committees would typically review the text, potentially hold hearings, and then vote on whether to send it to the full House for a vote. As a House Resolution, it expresses the sentiment of the House and does not require Senate approval or the President's signature to be adopted by the House.
If this resolution passes, the House of Representatives would formally declare its support for the January 3, 2026, operation to arrest Nicolas Maduro and commend President Trump for this action. It would also officially register the House's disapproval of specific Democratic lawmakers who criticized the operation. This public stance could influence future foreign policy debates regarding interventions and the executive branch's authority in such matters, clearly articulating a division within Congress on these issues.
Supporters Say
Supporters believe the operation was a courageous act of justice against a human rights abuser and commend the President's decisive action.
Critics Say
Critics, as cited in the resolution, argue the operation was unconstitutional, an illegal invasion, and an impeachable offense.
Supporters, including the resolution's sponsors, argue that Nicolas Maduro is a dangerous narcoterrorist and human rights abuser, and the operation to arrest him was a courageous and successful act of justice. They commend President Trump for taking decisive action that previous administrations reportedly failed to do, believing it will bring freedom to Venezuela and protect American interests. They express disappointment and concern that some Democratic members chose to criticize this action rather than celebrate it. Critics, as cited in the resolution, contend that the operation was not a legitimate law enforcement action, an unconstitutional invasion, and an impeachable offense. They suggest it was an illegal act by the administration, potentially dragging the U.S. into an "endless war" and undermining constitutional principles.