hold on there's just too much going on in Congress lmao...
Condemns a specific political attack, violence, urges unity.
Rep. Kim (R) and others, sent to House committees.
Introduced in House, awaiting committee review.
This House Resolution condemns a specific 2026 attack at the White House Correspondents' Dinner, denounces all political violence, and commends the rapid response of law enforcement. It urges public figures to reject rhetoric encouraging violence and calls for peaceful reconciliation. Introduced by Rep. Young Kim and others, it is currently under review by several House committees.
Introduced Apr 27, 2026
This resolution was introduced in the House of Representatives on April 27, 2026, by Representative Young Kim and co-sponsors. It has been referred to three committees: Judiciary, House Administration, and Homeland Security, for review. As a House Resolution, it expresses the official opinion of the House and does not require Senate approval or the President's signature to be adopted by the House.
If adopted, this resolution would officially state the House's condemnation of political violence and the specific attack at the dinner. It would also put formal pressure on elected officials, public figures, and media organizations to use less divisive language. Additionally, it emphasizes the importance of swift approval for the Department of Homeland Security's funding bill, specifically advocating for robust funding for the Secret Service to protect national leaders.
Supporters Say
Supporters believe it's crucial for the House to formally denounce political violence and support law enforcement.
Critics Say
Critics might argue the resolution is largely symbolic or questions its specific framing of the described event.
Proponents would highlight the necessity of an official stance against politically motivated violence to foster national unity and support institutions like the Secret Service. They might emphasize the importance of leaders setting a tone for civil discourse. Opponents, while generally against violence, could suggest that the resolution's detailed recounting of the incident or its call for specific funding is politically motivated rather than a neutral expression of condemnation.