hold on there's just too much going on in Congress lmao...
Designate a week to support home visiting programs.
Mr. LaHood (R-IL) and other lawmakers.
Introduced in House, referred to committee.
This House Resolution expresses support for designating a specific week in April 2026 as "National Home Visiting Week." It was introduced by Representative Darin LaHood, a Republican from Illinois, along with bipartisan co-sponsors. The resolution is currently under review by a House committee, meaning it has not yet received a vote from the full House of Representatives.
Introduced Apr 14, 2026
This is a House Resolution, meaning it expresses the opinion of the House of Representatives. It was introduced on April 14, 2026, and sent to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform. For it to pass, the committee would need to approve it, and then the full House would vote on it. It does not go to the Senate or become public law in the same way as a bill, but if passed, it signifies the House's official support for the designation.
This resolution itself would not change any laws or directly fund programs. However, if passed, it could raise public awareness about the benefits of home visiting programs for families with young children. This increased visibility might lead to more people learning about and accessing these supportive services, and could highlight the importance of early childhood development and the professionals who deliver these services.
Supporters Say
Supporters believe designating this week highlights critical support for families and children.
Critics Say
No specific opposition is noted for this type of supportive resolution.
The resolution emphasizes that home visiting programs help parents, promote healthy development, strengthen families, and reduce risks like abuse and neglect. It highlights positive outcomes, increased investment, and widespread implementation of such programs. Resolutions like this are often passed with bipartisan support to express the House's collective sentiment on a topic rather than to enact new laws or change existing ones. Therefore, active debate is uncommon.