hold on there's just too much going on in Congress lmao...
Supports UN's 2026 International Year of Rangelands and Pastoralists.
Rep. Maloy (R-UT) and 7 cosponsors introduced it.
Referred to Natural Resources and Agriculture committees.
This non-binding resolution expresses the House's support for a UN-designated year to raise awareness about rangelands and pastoralists (ranchers, herders). It recognizes their economic, social, and ecological contributions. The bill encourages federal agencies, universities, and organizations to promote education, research, and outreach on rangeland management. The sponsor, Rep. Maloy, serves on the House Natural Resources Committee, which is one of the two committees reviewing the resolution. Being in committee means no floor vote yet.
Introduced Mar 27, 2026
This bill is under review by a committee. The committee holds hearings, gathers testimony from experts and stakeholders, and may propose amendments. If the committee votes to advance it, the bill moves to the full chamber for debate and a vote.
Since this is a resolution (not a law), it doesn't change any rules or funding. However, it encourages federal agencies like the USDA and BLM to participate in outreach activities. You might see more news or school programs about how grazing reduces wildfire risk - the bill notes pastoral grazing can decrease wildfire risk by up to 60%. It also highlights that rangelands support food production (beef, lamb, wool) and provide clean water and wildlife habitat.
Supporters Say
Supports argue it spotlights the vital role of rangelands and ranchers in food security, wildfire prevention, and ecosystem health.
Critics Say
Critics might say it's a symbolic gesture that does not address concrete policy issues facing public lands, such as grazing fees or conservation conflicts.
Supporters, including the cosponsors from both parties, emphasize the economic and ecological benefits of rangelands and pastoralists, especially in Western states. Critics may note that while the resolution is non-controversial, it does not tackle contentious debates over livestock grazing on public lands, such as impacts on endangered species or water rights. Some environmental groups might argue that the resolution overlooks the negative effects of overgrazing, though the bill itself focuses on sustainable management and traditional knowledge.