hold on there's just too much going on in Congress lmao...
Asks the Senate to back DVT and PE Awareness Month.
Reps. Murphy and Tonko.
Introduced in the House, referred to committee.
This House Resolution, introduced for the 119th Congress, proposes that the Senate formally support and recognize "Deep Vein Thrombosis and Pulmonary Embolism Awareness Month." It details the severe impacts of these preventable conditions, which affect hundreds of thousands of Americans yearly. The resolution was sponsored by Representatives Murphy and Tonko and has been sent to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce for review.
Introduced Mar 12, 2026
This resolution was introduced in the House of Representatives on March 12, 2026, for the 119th Congress and has been referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce. As a House Resolution explicitly asking the Senate to support an awareness month, its passage in the House would serve as a formal request or expression of sentiment. For the Senate to actually support the month, it would need to pass its own separate measure. House Resolutions do not need Senate approval or the President's signature.
If this resolution leads to the Senate formally supporting "Deep Vein Thrombosis and Pulmonary Embolism Awareness Month," you might see more public health campaigns, educational materials, and media attention dedicated to these conditions. This could lead to a greater understanding of symptoms, risk factors, and preventative measures for serious blood clots among the general public and healthcare providers, potentially reducing preventable deaths and healthcare costs.
Supporters Say
Supporters believe raising public awareness can save lives and reduce healthcare costs by highlighting preventable conditions.
Critics Say
No specific opposition is typically voiced for symbolic resolutions that support health awareness months.
Resolutions like this one, which designate awareness months for health conditions, generally enjoy broad support across Congress. The core argument in favor is that increased public knowledge leads to better health outcomes and a reduction in preventable medical costs. Opposing such a measure is rare, as it is seen as a non-controversial way to highlight important public health issues.