hold on there's just too much going on in Congress lmao...
Non-binding resolution calling on Japan to ban slaughter of dogs and cats for food.
Rep. Garbarino (R-NY) and Rep. Davis (R-NC)
Introduced, referred to House Foreign Affairs Committee.
The resolution expresses the House's disapproval of killing dogs and cats for human consumption, noting the U.S. already banned it in 2018. It encourages Japan to follow countries like South Korea and Taiwan with a nationwide ban. The lead sponsor is Rep. Garbarino, a Republican from New York. The bill is in the Foreign Affairs Committee, no vote scheduled.
Introduced Mar 9, 2026
This bill is under review by a committee. The committee holds hearings, gathers testimony from experts and stakeholders, and may propose amendments. If the committee votes to advance it, the bill moves to the full chamber for debate and a vote.
As a non-binding resolution, it doesn't change any laws. However, it puts pressure on Japan's government by expressing U.S. congressional opinion. If passed, it could lead to more U.S.-Japan cooperation on animal welfare. The resolution also notes that civil society groups like the World Dog Alliance support this effort.
Supporters Say
Supporters argue that banning dog and cat meat upholds shared values of animal compassion and aligns with modern ethical standards.
Critics Say
Critics contend the resolution imposes U.S. values on Japanese cultural practices and may be seen as interfering with traditions.
Supporters point to growing Japanese public support for animal welfare, evidenced by an all-party animal welfare group in Japan's Diet. Critics note that the resolution explicitly says it does not interfere with religious or cultural practices protected by law, but some may still view it as foreign pressure. The debate centers around balancing animal welfare with respect for cultural differences.