hold on there's just too much going on in Congress lmao...
Recognizes water fluoridation as safe and effective for preventing tooth decay.
Rep. Lois Frankel (FL) and 11 co-sponsors.
In committee, no House vote yet.
This House Resolution declares that community water fluoridation is a safe and effective public health tool for preventing tooth decay and improving overall health. It was introduced by Representative Lois Frankel from Florida and referred to the House Energy and Commerce Committee. As a House Resolution, it expresses the opinion of the House of Representatives and does not become law, nor does it go to the Senate or the President.
Introduced Feb 26, 2026
This House Resolution was introduced on February 26, 2026, and sent to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce. For it to advance, the committee would need to consider and approve it, then it would need a vote by the full House of Representatives. As a House Resolution, it expresses the opinion of the House and does not become law, meaning it does not get sent to the Senate or the President.
If this resolution passes, it signals the House's support for community water fluoridation as a public health measure. This could lead to local governments considering or maintaining fluoride levels in their water supplies, potentially reducing tooth decay for residents. It also aims to strengthen support for dental health research and educational campaigns, particularly those focused on children during National Children's Dental Health Month.
Supporters Say
Supporters believe fluoridation is a proven, cost-effective way to prevent tooth decay and save healthcare costs.
Critics Say
The bill text does not explicitly outline arguments from critics of water fluoridation.
The resolution emphasizes that community water fluoridation has 75 years of scientific research supporting it and is endorsed by major health organizations. It points out that states prohibiting fluoridation raise concerns among public health professionals. However, the resolution itself does not present specific arguments against fluoridation or the reasons states might choose to ban it.