hold on there's just too much going on in Congress lmao...
Recognizes last slave ship, condemns US role in trade, urges memorial.
Representative Figures and a group of House members.
In committee, no House vote yet
This resolution, sponsored by Representative Figures and several other House members, aims to officially recognize the historical significance of the Clotilda and condemn the U.S. role in the slave trade. It also suggests establishing a memorial on the U.S. Capitol Grounds. The resolution is currently under review by the House Foreign Affairs and House Administration Committees, meaning it has not yet been debated or voted on by the full House.
Introduced Feb 26, 2026
This resolution was introduced in the House of Representatives on February 26, 2026, and sent to two committees for review: Foreign Affairs and House Administration. For it to move forward, either committee would need to consider and approve it. As a House Resolution, it only needs to pass the House, not the Senate, and does not require the President's signature to take effect as an expression of the House's views.
If passed, this resolution would serve as an official statement from the House of Representatives, formally acknowledging the last known illegal arrival of enslaved Africans on the ship Clotilda and its lasting impact on their descendants. It would also formally condemn the United States' historical participation in the Atlantic slave trade through its institutions. Additionally, it encourages the Architect of the Capitol to consider creating a memorial within the Capitol Grounds to honor the Clotilda story and all victims of the slave trade.
Supporters Say
Supporters believe this resolution is a crucial step towards national healing and confronting the painful history of slavery.
Critics Say
Critics might argue that resolutions are symbolic gestures and do not enact policy changes or provide tangible reparations for historical wrongs.
This type of resolution, while not creating new laws, aims to formally acknowledge historical injustices. Those in favor emphasize its importance for public education, reconciliation, and providing a voice to historically marginalized communities. Concerns often revolve around whether such symbolic actions are sufficient to address complex historical harms.