hold on there's just too much going on in Congress lmao...
Denounces presidential efforts to control federal elections.
Mr. Mfume
In committee, no House vote yet.
This House Resolution condemns statements made by President Donald J. Trump regarding federal control over elections, calling them unconstitutional. It was submitted by Representative Mr. Mfume on February 12, 2026. It has been referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary, meaning it is still being reviewed and has not yet been voted on by the full House of Representatives.
Introduced Feb 12, 2026
This resolution was introduced in the House of Representatives and immediately referred to the Committee on the Judiciary. For it to advance, the committee must consider it and vote to send it to the full House for a floor vote. If it passes the House, it does not go to the Senate or the President, as it is a House-only resolution expressing the chamber's sentiment.
This resolution, if passed, would affirm the House's position that states and local authorities, along with Congress, are primarily responsible for federal elections. It seeks to prevent any presidential attempt to take direct control over election processes, ensuring that the existing constitutional framework for election administration is upheld. This means the procedures for voter registration, polling places, and ballot counting would remain under state and local authority, as currently mandated by the Constitution.
Supporters Say
Supporters argue it upholds the Constitution's assignment of election oversight to states and Congress, preventing presidential overreach.
Critics Say
The resolution itself does not present specific criticisms, but those it denounces might argue a federal role in elections is sometimes necessary.
Advocates for this resolution emphasize the constitutional principles of federalism and separation of powers, stating that the President lacks the authority to nationalize elections. They view the statements it denounces as undermining the rule of law and public trust. While the resolution does not detail opposing viewpoints, implicit critics of the resolution might suggest that some form of federal intervention could be justified to address perceived election integrity issues, or that the resolution is a politically motivated response.