hold on there's just too much going on in Congress lmao...
Non-binding resolution to replace the Monroe Doctrine with a cooperative policy.
Rep. Nydia Velazquez (D-NY) and 18 co-sponsors.
Referred to multiple committees; no vote scheduled.
This resolution expresses the sense of the House that the U.S. should formally abandon the Monroe Doctrine and adopt a "New Good Neighbor" policy focused on non-intervention, ending most sanctions, and cooperating with Latin American and Caribbean countries on climate, trade, and human rights. It is sponsored by Representative Velazquez, a Democrat from New York, and referred to the Committees on Foreign Affairs, Financial Services, and Ways and Means. Resolutions like this are statements of opinion and do not have the force of law.
Introduced Feb 10, 2026
This bill is under review by a committee. The committee holds hearings, gathers testimony from experts and stakeholders, and may propose amendments. If the committee votes to advance it, the bill moves to the full chamber for debate and a vote.
The resolution calls for terminating all unilateral sanctions on Latin American and Caribbean countries, including the Cuba embargo. It also supports significant U.S. contributions to the Amazon Fund and a UN Loss and Damage Trust for climate action, which could mean more U.S. taxpayer dollars going to environmental programs abroad. Additionally, it pushes for changes in international financial institutions like the IMF to reduce loan conditions, potentially affecting global economic policies.
Supporters Say
Supporters say the Monroe Doctrine has been used to justify U.S. intervention and that a new policy would build trust and cooperation.
Critics Say
Critics argue that abandoning the doctrine would weaken U.S. influence and allow hostile powers to expand in the hemisphere.
Supporters point to a long history of U.S. military interventions and coups in Latin America, arguing that a non-interventionist approach would improve relations and reduce migration. Critics contend that the Monroe Doctrine has protected U.S. interests and that dropping it would create a power vacuum that China or Russia could exploit, potentially threatening U.S. national security.