hold on there's just too much going on in Congress lmao...
Creates a commission to assess a President's capacity to serve.
Sponsored by Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-MD) with many cosponsors.
Introduced in the House, referred to committees.
This bill proposes establishing a new Commission within the legislative branch whose job would be to medically examine a sitting President if Congress directs it. The goal is to determine if the President is unable to perform their duties due to mental or physical reasons, as outlined in the 25th Amendment. The main sponsor, Congressman Jamie Raskin from Maryland, introduced the bill. It has been referred to the House Judiciary Committee and the House Rules Committee for review and consideration.
Introduced Apr 14, 2026
This bill was introduced in the House of Representatives on April 14, 2026. It has been assigned to the House Judiciary Committee and the House Rules Committee. Before it can move forward, it must be considered and potentially approved by these committees. If it passes committee, it would then need a vote in the full House, followed by similar steps in the Senate, and finally the President's signature to become law.
If this bill becomes law, a standing Commission on Presidential Capacity would be created, comprising medical experts and former high-ranking officials. Congress could then initiate a process for this commission to conduct a medical examination of the President to assess their ability to serve, with very fast timelines for congressional action and the examination itself. Notably, if a President were to refuse such an examination, the Commission would be able to consider that refusal when making its determination about the President's capacity.
Supporters Say
Supporters might argue this creates a clear, non-partisan process to address presidential incapacity, safeguarding national security.
Critics Say
Critics might worry it could be used for political attacks or undermine presidential authority and privacy.
Those in favor could contend that establishing a permanent, expert commission provides a necessary and structured mechanism to apply the 25th Amendment's provisions regarding presidential inability, preventing political gridlock during a potential crisis. They might emphasize the importance of having a clear process for evaluating the physical and mental fitness of the Commander-in-Chief. Opponents, however, might express concerns that such a commission, despite its intended neutrality, could become politicized, leading to frequent and potentially baseless challenges to a President's health. They might also argue it could intrude on executive independence or violate a President's medical privacy.