hold on there's just too much going on in Congress lmao...
Repeals transit worker protections tied to federal funding.
Rep. Scott Perry (R, PA)
Introduced in House, referred to committee.
This bill aims to remove specific federal requirements that protect public transportation employees when their jobs or working conditions are affected by projects receiving federal funding. These protections are found in section 5333(b) of title 49 of the U.S. Code. The bill was introduced by Representative Scott Perry, a Republican from Pennsylvania, and is currently being reviewed by the House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure. This is an early step in the legislative process, so no votes have occurred yet.
Introduced Apr 9, 2026
This bill was introduced in the House of Representatives and then assigned to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure. It must pass through this committee and then receive a vote by the full House. If it passes the House, it would then move to the Senate for consideration, and finally to the President to become law. As of now, it remains in committee review.
If this bill becomes law, federal requirements that currently protect public transit workers when their jobs are affected by federal funding for transit projects would be eliminated. This could allow public transit agencies to alter employee benefits, collective bargaining agreements, and job security measures without the federal oversight that currently ensures worker protections. Essentially, the safeguards tied to federal financial aid for transit services would no longer apply, potentially leading to changes in employment conditions for those workers.
Supporters Say
Supporters would argue this bill removes unnecessary federal regulations, giving local transit agencies more flexibility.
Critics Say
Critics would contend that this bill strips essential protections from transit workers, potentially leading to job losses or reduced benefits.
Those who support this bill would likely argue that it reduces unnecessary federal interference, allowing local transit agencies more flexibility to manage their operations and budgets. They might claim it streamlines project development and reduces costs. Conversely, critics, often including labor unions and worker advocacy groups, would likely argue that repealing these protections would weaken workers' rights, making transit jobs less secure and potentially leading to lower pay or benefits for public transportation employees.