hold on there's just too much going on in Congress lmao...
Denies tax breaks for businesses using foreign adversary technology.
Mr. Moran, a Representative.
Introduced in the House of Representatives.
This bill aims to deny specific tax credits and deductions to businesses that use technology controlled by foreign adversaries or are themselves considered prohibited foreign entities. The goal is to discourage reliance on potentially risky foreign technology. The bill was introduced by Representative Moran and has been sent to the House Committee on Ways and Means for review.
Introduced Feb 11, 2026
The bill has been introduced in the House of Representatives and referred to the Committee on Ways and Means. For it to become law, it must pass this committee, then be voted on and passed by the full House. After that, it would need to pass the Senate and be signed by the President.
If enacted, businesses using technology designated as 'foreign adversary-controlled' would lose valuable tax write-offs, such as bonus depreciation for equipment, full expensing for research, and certain business interest deductions. This could prompt businesses to switch to alternative technology providers. Such changes might lead to increased operational costs for some companies, which could potentially be passed on to consumers through higher prices or affect the range of available products and services.
Supporters Say
Supporters argue this bill protects national security by reducing reliance on technology from potentially hostile foreign entities.
Critics Say
Critics might contend it could increase costs for businesses and limit technological innovation or choice.
Those in favor would likely emphasize the importance of safeguarding sensitive data and critical infrastructure from foreign influence and espionage by disincentivizing the use of technology from designated adversaries. Opponents might raise concerns about the economic impact on businesses, arguing that the denial of tax benefits could lead to increased operational expenses, stifle competition, or limit access to competitive technologies, ultimately hurting consumers.