hold on there's just too much going on in Congress lmao...
Denies federal health insurance subsidies and Medicaid to sex offenders.
Rep. Greg Steube, Republican from Florida
Introduced in the House, no vote yet
This bill, known as the "Criminals' Loss of Eligibility and Assistance Networks Act" or "CLEAN Act," proposes to stop individuals identified as sex offenders from receiving a refundable tax credit for health insurance coverage and from getting federally funded medical assistance through Medicaid. It was introduced by Representative Greg Steube, a Republican representing Florida's 17th congressional district, and has been sent to two committees for review. No votes have been held on the bill yet.
Introduced Feb 9, 2026
H.R. 7453 was introduced in the House of Representatives on February 9, 2026. It has been referred to the House Ways and Means Committee, which handles tax-related issues, and the House Energy and Commerce Committee, which oversees health policy, for consideration. Before it can move forward, these committees must review it and potentially vote to send it to the full House for a vote. If it passes the House, it would then go to the Senate for their process before potentially becoming law.
If this bill becomes law, individuals defined as sex offenders under the Adam Walsh Child Protection and Safety Act of 2006 would no longer qualify for the premium tax credit, which helps lower monthly health insurance costs for those who buy plans through the Affordable Care Act marketplace. Additionally, federal funding for medical assistance provided to sex offenders through the Medicaid program would stop. States would also gain the option to entirely stop providing Medicaid medical assistance to these individuals, even if federal funds were not involved, for anyone enrolled or reenrolled after the bill's enactment date.
Supporters Say
Supporters argue that taxpayer money should not be used to provide health care benefits to individuals convicted of sex offenses.
Critics Say
Critics may argue that denying health care benefits could lead to greater public health risks and hinder rehabilitation efforts.
Those in favor of the bill would likely emphasize accountability and the belief that individuals who have committed sex offenses should not receive public assistance for health care. They might argue this ensures responsible use of federal funds. Opponents, however, could raise concerns about the public health implications of denying medical assistance, noting that it might lead to untreated health conditions that could strain emergency services or contribute to broader societal health issues. They might also contend that access to basic services, including healthcare, is crucial for rehabilitation and reintegration into society.