hold on there's just too much going on in Congress lmao...
Removes time limits for federal prosecution of certain homicides.
Introduced by Mr. Johnson, a Republican Representative from South Dakota.
Introduced in the House, sent to committee.
This bill, known as 'Kamisha's Law,' proposes to remove the statute of limitations for several specific federal homicide offenses, including second-degree murder and voluntary manslaughter. This means prosecutors could bring charges at any time, regardless of when the crime occurred. It was introduced by Mr. Johnson, a Republican from South Dakota, on February 4, 2026, and is currently awaiting review by the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Introduced Feb 4, 2026
The bill was introduced in the House of Representatives on February 4, 2026. It has been referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary for review. Before it can move forward, the committee must consider it, potentially hold hearings, and vote to send it to the full House for a vote. If it passes the House, it would then go to the Senate, and eventually to the President to be signed into law.
If this bill becomes law, federal prosecutors would no longer face a time limit (statute of limitations) to bring charges for crimes like federal second-degree murder, voluntary manslaughter, and attempted manslaughter under specific circumstances outlined in the bill. This could potentially allow federal authorities to reopen and pursue cases that were previously considered too old to prosecute, offering new avenues for justice for victims' families.
Supporters Say
Supporters would argue that serious crimes like homicide should not have a time limit for prosecution, ensuring justice can always be pursued.
Critics Say
Critics might raise concerns about the challenges of prosecuting very old cases due to lost evidence or unreliable memories.
Proponents of eliminating statutes of limitation for serious crimes often argue that the gravity of offenses like homicide warrants an indefinite period for accountability, asserting that justice should not have an expiration date. While the bill text does not explicitly detail counterarguments, critics of such changes typically point to the difficulties of fair trials when evidence has degraded or witnesses' memories have faded over many years.