hold on there's just too much going on in Congress lmao...
Aims to protect availability of replacement parts from EPA regulation.
Mr. Hudson (R-NC) and Mr. Balderson (R-OH).
In committee, no House vote yet
This bill clarifies when the EPA can regulate replacement parts for everyday items like electronics or appliances, generally exempting older designs. It would require the EPA to show specific parts significantly increase risk before restricting them and ensures a supply of necessary chemicals. It was introduced by Representatives Hudson (Republican, North Carolina) and Balderson (Republican, Ohio) and is currently being reviewed by the House Energy and Commerce Committee.
Introduced Jan 21, 2026
The bill was introduced in the House of Representatives on January 21, 2026, and sent to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce for review. For it to become law, it must pass this committee, then be approved by a vote in the full House. After that, it would need to pass the Senate and be signed by the President.
If passed, this bill aims to ensure that replacement parts for complex durable goods and consumer goods (like cars, appliances, or older electronics) remain available. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) would be largely prevented from regulating these parts unless it proves they significantly contribute to public health risks. It also seeks to protect the upstream supply chain, meaning chemical substances needed to produce these parts could not be prohibited by the EPA.
Supporters Say
Proponents would argue this bill protects consumers' ability to repair their goods, supports the "right to repair" movement, and prevents unnecessary regulations that could increase costs.
Critics Say
Opponents might argue it could limit the EPA's power to protect public health by making it harder to regulate potentially harmful substances in replacement parts.
The bill's supporters believe it promotes affordability and extends the lifespan of products by ensuring parts are available for repair. They see it as a check on federal overreach. Critics might express concern that by making it more difficult for the EPA to act, the bill could inadvertently allow unsafe materials to remain in replacement parts, posing environmental or health risks.