hold on there's just too much going on in Congress lmao...
EPA must classify 'forever chemicals' (PFAS) as hazardous air pollutants.
Introduced by Rep. Stevens (D-MI) with bipartisan support from 6 cosponsors.
Introduced in House, referred to committee.
This bill, introduced by Representative Haley Stevens, a Democrat from Michigan, directs the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to add all perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) with a specific chemical structure to the list of hazardous air pollutants. Stevens has a background in manufacturing and environmental policy, aligning with the bill's focus. The bill was just introduced, meaning it's at the very beginning of the legislative process.
Introduced Jan 8, 2026
H.R. 6990 was introduced in the House of Representatives on January 8, 2026. It has been referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce for review. For it to become law, it must pass through this committee, be voted on and approved by the full House, then pass the Senate, and finally be signed by the President. There is a long way to go before it could become law.
If this bill becomes law, the EPA would be required to label certain PFAS chemicals as hazardous air pollutants. This classification would open the door for new regulations under the Clean Air Act, potentially leading to a reduction in PFAS emissions from industrial sources, which could improve air quality in affected communities. Companies emitting these substances would likely need to invest in new technologies or processes to comply with stricter environmental standards, which could affect their operations and costs.
Supporters Say
This bill protects public health by tackling widespread and dangerous air pollutants.
Critics Say
The bill could impose significant costs and regulatory burdens on various industries.
Supporters of such legislation often argue that classifying PFAS as hazardous air pollutants is a critical step to safeguard public health and the environment from these long-lasting chemicals, which have been linked to various health issues. Critics, conversely, frequently express concerns about the economic impact on industries that use or produce PFAS, citing potential job losses or increased consumer costs due to compliance requirements for new environmental regulations.