hold on there's just too much going on in Congress lmao...
Directs President to withdraw troops from Iran hostilities unless Congress approves.
Rep. Moulton (D-MA) and 8 co-sponsors.
Introduced in the House.
This resolution, sponsored by Representative Seth Moulton (D-MA) and a bipartisan group of eight co-sponsors, aims to force the President to pull U.S. military forces out of any hostilities involving Iran. It was introduced in the House and referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs. This means it's an early step and hasn't yet been debated or voted on by the full House.
Introduced Apr 28, 2026
This resolution is currently in the 'Introduced' stage. It was referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs. For it to advance, the committee would need to consider it, possibly hold hearings, and then vote to send it to the full House for a vote. If it passes the House, it would then go to the Senate for their consideration and vote. Both chambers must pass it for this type of resolution to become effective.
If this resolution passes, the President would be directed to remove any U.S. Armed Forces currently engaged in hostilities against Iran, unless Congress has explicitly authorized such action or declared war. This means U.S. military personnel would be withdrawn from these specific operations. The bill aims to ensure that significant military actions are backed by a formal decision from Congress, potentially reasserting legislative authority over military engagement abroad and ensuring public funds are only used for congressionally approved conflicts.
Supporters Say
Supporters believe Congress, not the President, should authorize military action, especially against Iran.
Critics Say
Critics might argue it limits the President's ability to respond quickly to threats, or that specific actions are not 'hostilities'.
Those in favor argue that the U.S. Constitution grants Congress the sole power to declare war, and this resolution upholds that principle by requiring explicit congressional approval for military engagement in Iran. Opponents might contend that presidents need flexibility for national security, or that this could undermine deterrence in a volatile region. They could also argue that certain U.S. actions do not technically constitute 'hostilities' under the War Powers Resolution.