hold on there's just too much going on in Congress lmao...
Directs President to remove US forces from Iran hostilities without Congress OK.
Mr. Khanna (Sponsor: party/state not specified in text)
Introduced in House, referred to committee.
This resolution, introduced by Mr. Khanna, directs the President to remove U.S. Armed Forces from any hostilities against Iran unless Congress explicitly declares war or authorizes military force. It was introduced in the House of Representatives and has been sent to a committee for review, meaning it is in the very early stages of the legislative process.
Introduced Apr 21, 2026
This bill is currently in the 'Introduced' stage in the House of Representatives. It has been referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs. For it to become law, it would first need to pass out of this committee, then pass a vote in the full House, then pass the Senate, and finally be signed by the President.
If this resolution passes, the U.S. President would be required to get explicit Congressional approval (a declaration of war or specific authorization) before engaging U.S. forces in hostilities against Iran. This does not prevent the U.S. from defending itself, its troops, diplomatic facilities, or allies from an immediate threat. Additionally, it would not disrupt or stop intelligence gathering or sharing activities related to threats from Iran with U.S. coalition partners.
Supporters Say
Supporters argue it upholds Congress's constitutional role in deciding whether the nation goes to war.
Critics Say
Critics might suggest it could limit the President's ability to act swiftly in national security situations.
Those in favor of this resolution believe it ensures that a decision as significant as engaging in military conflict rests with the legislative branch, as outlined in the Constitution. Conversely, opponents might argue that such a resolution could tie the President's hands, making it harder to respond quickly and effectively to evolving threats to U.S. interests or personnel abroad.