hold on there's just too much going on in Congress lmao...
Removes unauthorized U.S. forces from Venezuela.
Rep. McGovern (D-MA) and Rep. Massie (R-KY) introduced.
Introduced in the House.
This concurrent resolution, introduced by Representative Jim McGovern, a Democrat from Massachusetts, and Representative Thomas Massie, a Republican from Kentucky, would direct the President to withdraw any U.S. Armed Forces from Venezuela unless Congress has explicitly authorized their presence through a declaration of war or specific law. It is currently in the initial stage of the legislative process.
Introduced Jan 7, 2026
This concurrent resolution was introduced in the House of Representatives on January 7, 2026, and referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs. For it to take effect as a directive under the War Powers Resolution, both the House and the Senate would need to pass it.
If passed, the President would be directed to remove any U.S. Armed Forces currently in Venezuela, unless Congress has specifically voted to authorize their deployment. This would mean that any future U.S. military action in Venezuela would require explicit approval from Congress, shifting more decision-making power to the legislative branch regarding the use of military force.
Supporters Say
Supporters believe it reasserts Congress's constitutional role in authorizing military force.
Critics Say
Critics might argue it could limit presidential flexibility in foreign policy and national security.
Those in favor often argue that the Constitution grants Congress, not the President, the power to declare war and authorize military force, making this resolution a necessary check on executive power. Opponents might contend that such resolutions can hinder a president's ability to respond swiftly to evolving national security threats or protect U.S. interests abroad.